Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Damien Smith Pfister

Photo of Damien Pfister

Associate Professor, Communication

(301) 405-8988

2116 Skinner Building
Get Directions


Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh

Research Expertise

Digital Studies

Curriculum Vitae
Cover of Networked Rhetorics by Damien Pfister

Damien Smith Pfister is an Associate Professor of Communication at the University of Maryland. His work examines the intersection of the rhetorical and the digital, attending to the new technological infrastructures that shape civic culture.

His interest in how nascent genres of communication provide new opportunities for citizens to affect public deliberation is reflected in Networked Rhetorics, Networked Media: Attention and Deliberation in the Early Blogosphere (Penn State, 2014). Pfister is the co-editor, with Michele Kennerly of the Pennsylvania State University, of Ancient Rhetorics + Digital Networks (Alabama, 2018), a volume that looks to ancient figures, texts, and sensibilities to illuminate communication phenomena in digital networks. He is the author of essays appearing in such journals as Philosophy & RhetoricArgumentation and AdvocacyEnvironmental CommunicationRhetoric Review, and the Quarterly Journal of Speech. Pfister is the book review editor at Rhetoric Society Quarterly and co-editor of the book series Rhetoric + Digitality at the University of Alabama Press.


Digitality, Diversity, and the Future of Rhetoric and Public Address

Article indicates how theorizing rhetoric and digitality transforms critical and historical traditions.


Lead: Damien Smith Pfister, Carly Woods
Non-ARHU Contributor(s): E. Johanna Hartelius & Jessica H. Lu

The pandemic and economic catastrophes of 2020 and the forms of resistance that surged against racist systemic and physical violence indicate, we contend, that studying public address in the present moment requires attention to the mutual contingency of rhetoric and digitality. Relying on interdisciplinary literatures and a global perspective, we direct such attention along three vectors: platforms, commons, and methods. We indicate how theorizing rhetoric and digitality transforms critical and historical traditions. In expanding the purview of the public address tradition while retaining the tradition's hermeneutic potential, we emphasize the need to challenge disciplinary terms and the desirability of expanded analytical methods. We submit that by not attending sufficiently to the advent and diffusion of digital media technologies, public address scholarship misses opportunities to shape ongoing conversations about how rhetoric mediates public affairs; and that insofar as struggles for racial justice are bound up with, not just mediated by, digitality, the prospects of diversifying rhetoric's professoriate increase when research on this topic is central rather than peripheral.

Digitality, Rhetoric, and Protocological Fascism; Or, Fascist Ants & Democratic Cicadas

Opposed to the ant’s efficiency logics is the cicada, associated with poetic world-making, joy, and mania; the cicada might be recuperated as an icon of democratic renewal, resonance, resistance, and re-enchantment.


Lead: Damien Smith Pfister

Myths about pharmaka are especially useful during dramatic cultural and technical changes. This essay first explores a contemporary myth, Bernard Stiegler’s “Allegory of the Anthill,” as a warning about protocological fascism – the industrialized and undemocratic exercise of control through digital infrastructures. Following Stiegler, I suggest that the algorithms structuring many digital technologies threaten to impose ant-like efficiency logics on subjects, making them more susceptible to the homogenizing political impulses of fascism. If not the logos of the ant, what should we aspire to? To answer this question, I turn to the myth of the cicadas in Plato’s Phaedrus. Lysias, Socrates’ antithesis in the Phaedrus, is associated with an ant-like practical rhetoric that prizes industry over virtue. Opposed to the ant’s efficiency logics is the cicada, associated with poetic world-making, joy, and mania. I argue that the cicada might be recuperated as an icon of democratic renewal, resonance, resistance, and re-enchantment.

Ancient Rhetorics & Digital Networks

An examination of two seemingly incongruous areas of study: classical models of argumentation and modern modes of digital communication.


Lead: Damien Smith Pfister
Non-ARHU Contributor(s): Michele Kennerly

What can ancient rhetorical theory possibly tell us about the role of new digital media technologies in contemporary public culture? Some central issues we currently deal with—making sense of information abundance, persuading others in our social network, navigating new media ecologies, and shaping broader cultural currents—also pressed upon the ancients.
Ancient Rhetorics and Digital Networks makes this connection explicit, reexamining key figures, texts, concepts, and sensibilities from ancient rhetoric in light of the glow of digital networks, or, ordered conversely, surveying the angles and tangles of digital networks from viewpoints afforded by ancient rhetoric. By providing an orientation grounded in ancient rhetorics, this collection simultaneously historicizes contemporary developments and reenergizes ancient rhetorical vocabularies.
Contributors engage with a variety of digital phenomena including remix, big data, identity and anonymity, memes and virals, visual images, decorum, and networking. Taken together, the essays in Ancient Rhetorics and Digital Networks help us to understand and navigate some of the fundamental communicative issues we deal with today.

Networked Media, Networked Rhetorics: Attention and Deliberation in the Early Blogosphere

Networked Media, Networked Rhetorics concludes with a bold outline for rhetorical studies after the internet.


Lead: Damien Smith Pfister

In Networked Media, Networked Rhetorics, Damien Pfister explores communicative practices in networked media environments, analyzing, in particular, how the blogosphere has changed the conduct and coverage of public debate. Pfister shows how the late modern imaginary was susceptible to “deliberation traps” related to invention, emotion, and expertise, and how bloggers have played a role in helping contemporary public deliberation evade these traps. Three case studies at the heart of Networked Media, Networked Rhetorics show how new intermediaries, including bloggers, generate publicity, solidarity, and translation in the networked public sphere. Bloggers “flooding the zone” in the wake of Trent Lott’s controversial toast to Strom Thurmond in 2002 demonstrated their ability to invent and circulate novel arguments; the pre-2003 invasion reports from the “Baghdad blogger” illustrated how solidarity is built through affective connections; and the science blog RealClimate continues to serve as a rapid-response site for the translation of expert claims for public audiences. Networked Media, Networked Rhetorics concludes with a bold outline for rhetorical studies after the internet.